

[QUOTE]...Arty......'' is just crazy talk. The fact is, AA is the best hand and it is a huge favourite against the random hands that villains at the table have. This doesn't mean that AA will always win, or even win 82% of the time, but with careful play, pocket aces will win the pot on full ring tables about 80% of the time, and on 6max tables more than 85% of the time. This "38%" figure you pulled out of the air shows a fundamental misunderstanding of hand strength and probability.''
.................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ......... Holdem say's...... You can not say that, it is not crazy talk, as it stands preflop utg aces can not be any percent in reality because there as been no involved play from the other opps. If all 8 opp's call you , your aces are weak. An estimated 38%. The variance on aces alters. We can make judgement by playing styles. Example we have 3 tags and 1 nit  We can presume they will fold to an utg raise, they understand. We are left then with 4 lags/fish with high vpip. We can presume then our aces may get called into a 5 way pot. 102 odds , they have ten cards we have 2. Simple dumbed down logic, however they have more chance of hitting the board between them. Aces are only 82% over any 2, 5050 , 2 v 2 cards. Example  folded around to us on the button with hole cards aces, we know then the most that can happen is a 3 way pot and so on... So we know then our aces are at a good percentage favourite to win the hand. This is just a simple understanding and way to use poker stove in your head with no maths involved or relative simple maths. 




This is a weird debate, but as much as the equity of AA drops the more people there are in the hand, the more the equity of the other hands drops too with players holding each others outs, blockers etc.
AA is still the strongest starting hand. 




Quote:
Yes, also the other players equity drop, and I wish poker stove was working, I think Aces may be EV 9 way , but then maybe the pot odds justifies it, I am unsure, I just know, I would not fancy calling a 9 way pot with ACES...... What would the maths be on Aces against 8 other random hands in an allinn situation? 1500k stacks.... 




At a 9 handed table, with AA versus 8 random handed opponents
all with 1500 stacks. You get your aces in a 34% favourite (other players share the 66% at about average 8% each)  you will win 1/3 of the time you will win 8x1500 profit in chips each time you win (1/3) you will lose 1x1500 chips each time you lose (2/3) you are massively winning with aces in this situation in the long run Ed 




Quote:
13 Time Bracelet Winner





Thank you for the maths.
Interesting though that between them they would have 66%. Between them in time, this surely makes, ''between them'', better odds to your aces? 




Quote:
Between them yes But no one hand will have greater odds that AA (with 8 other random hands) say first hand of Open Leauge and you have AA and you shove and get called by 8 others 13500 chips in the middle you have 31% chance to win players 28 all have a 7.6% chance to win so if we do this 100 times win 13500 31 times = 418500 chips won but we lose 69 times 1500*69 = 103500 chips Net loss or gain is 418500103500 = + 315000 so this is a plus EV shove of 3150 chips every time we are in this situation. 13 Time Bracelet Winner





Quote:
I sort of see it the opposite, we may win more chips but we will lose more times, so in tourney for example we would get knocked out more, is that not the case? I see it has 21 against. 




What Grade b said
In a tourney we still want to get in a situation where we are expecting to win chips on average and a whopping +3150 in Grade b's example is huge. Even if two thirds of the time we get in this situation we lose our tournament life, it would be hard to argue against taking this +EV spot. 




Yes not any one hand is greater in strength than Aces has a starting hand, but 8 other hands, and aces are behind to the whole, is this not the case?
You would be 21 underdog although still favourite over any two, but not favourite over the situation of a full ring table all in? 




It doesn't matter that we might not have more than 50% equity against everyone. All that matters is whether the play is profitable in the long run.
If we are contributing X percentage of the pot, but our equity is greater than X %, then it is a play with a positive expectation. It is +EV. In a 9handed pot, we're contributing 11.1% of the pot, but we're winning it about 35% of the time. This is a hugely profitable situation to be in. It's simple pot odds really, a bit like when you make bet on a horse race. If a bookmaker lays odds of 3 to 1, but you expect the horse to win more often than 1 in 4 times, you would place the bet. With aces in a 9handed pot, the pot lays odds of 8 to 1, but you're getting paid a lot more often than one in 9 times! Your winning chances are closer to 2 to 1. The whole debate is a little weird anyway, because when I raise with AA UTG, I've never had 8 players go all in after me! Even at 2NL, some people respect my raises. Bracelet Winner





Quote:
Having aces in mid position, and every one folds around to you, you know your aces then have a stronger percent chance, than having aces utg. Against ATC it stays the same it is 82 percent favourite. I consider the variance and equity on aces does alter players per pot? 




The %'s are based on how many people are in the pot... POSITION IS IRRELEVANT!
John (JWK24) SuperModerator
6 Time Bracelet Winner 




Quote:





I have got to laugh. Every online odds calculator I have ever seen or tried has pocket aces favored pre flop, regardless of the number of players. It ranges from a high of 85 percent when it is oneonone, to a low of 54 percent when there are 8 others in the pot. No matter how you figure it, aces are the best hand pre flop.
The big "but" to that last statement is what happens post flop. At that point, it becomes a virtual crap shoot. This is regardless of the number of players in the hand. A player with 7  2 off suit will have a superior hand when the flop comes up with a twopair or trip hand. The idiot who called your allin with a 4  3 suited hand will have you dominated if the flop comes up with three in his suit. Now look at position. If you hold pocket aces under the gun, there is the potential of 9 players being in the pot. You still have the better odds pre flop of 54 percent, but that's too close to a coin flip. This is where betting strategy comes into play. I cannot imagine anyone with pocket aces not trying to whittle down the field by betting, and big. Does this guarantee you a win? Can you say river rats, or calling stations? The odds might remain in your favor, but don't forget that any hand holds the potential of winning. If I may reverse your statement. Instead of saying pocket aces has a better potential of winning pre flop, what hands do you believe have a better chance? As I see it, the debate over the best hand is an undisputable fact when we are prior to the community. This is fact. Accept it. It is as real as gravity. To say otherwise leaves one open to ridicule at best, or a potential mark in future games. Where the line blurs is when the flop is shown. At this point, every hand will have a different twocard nut combination. That will change with the turn and river. What you need to do is look at the general history of the hands played. I'm willing to bet that aces are still your best performing hand when it comes to winloss. It might not be a great money winner since a smart player will recognize the message you're sending via bets and act accordingly. Let me quote my study. Pocket aces have a high winning rate, but a low return ratio when proper betting strategy is used and read. It therefore becomes a tradeoff between enticing a player with a weak hand into betting and scaring off those with the potential of cracking your aces. Like any investment, the greater the risks, the greater the payoff. Translation, slow playing aces might win you huge pots, but you'll lose a lot of those pots too. 




Quote:
I am not looking at this from a negative point of view, but a positive point of view. If we can determine, for example, we have 3 calling stations at the table, we know regardless of raise, we are going 4 way into the flop. So by this, we can predict what our odds are, before any action has taken place. Foreseen the future actions of the players. 




Quote:





I CAN think of a situation when AA is not the favorite against 8 other players  but it does involve knowing what 2 other players have.
Say you have AA and you see the player on your right also has AA the player on your left is equally bad at protecting their cards and shows you a PP. That PP has roughly 34% more equity in the pot than you do. AcAd 12.7% = win of 171450 loss of 130950 =40500 or +405 chips per attempt AhAs 13.3% = win of 179550 loss of 130050 = 49500 or +495 chips per attempt This was using KcKd and 6 random hands on Pokrstove Grade b 13 Time Bracelet Winner





I'm not sure where you got your information Cairn but:
Code:
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 2,067,932 games 60.051 secs 34,436 games/sec Board: Dead: equity win tie Hand 0: 31.050% 30.84% 00.21% { AA } Hand 1: 07.674% 06.89% 00.79% { random } Hand 2: 07.663% 06.88% 00.79% { random } Hand 3: 07.641% 06.86% 00.78% { random } Hand 4: 07.673% 06.89% 00.79% { random } Hand 5: 07.666% 06.88% 00.79% { random } Hand 6: 07.673% 06.88% 00.79% { random } Hand 7: 07.664% 06.88% 00.78% { random } Hand 8: 07.659% 06.88% 00.78% { random } Hand 9: 07.637% 06.85% 00.79% { random } 




Ace,
It seems to me that you are discussing tourney EV (tEV). Allin the first hand with Aces, when you win the hand you do not increase they probability of winning the tourney eightfold. The Independent Chip Model (ICM) is the most accepted way to measure tEV, but it requires information on every player in the field. 


