Home / Community / Forum / Poker Education / Texas Hold'Em Cash Games /

10NL 6-max Zoom QJs MW

Old
Default
10NL 6-max Zoom QJs MW - Fri Jan 17, 2014, 05:07 PM
(#1)
fp_boss77's Avatar
Since: Jan 2012
Posts: 490
Hi, villain on the BT is playing 21/15/5 FCB=20% over 178 hands. Others are unknown.

If this was heads-up I'd certainly check raise with this hand.

But I'm having trouble proceeding with FD on multi-way pots.
I tend to play more passive.

How should the play differ if we had AhKh for the nut FD ?



Cheers!
 
Old
Default
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 12:32 AM
(#2)
GarethC23's Avatar
Since: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,273
If we have the nut flush draw we absolutely can't fold the turn. I think here we have three legitimate concerns which merit your fold:

1) Getting paid -- can we lead on a heart river and get called by a ton of worse? Probably not. Worse folds, better calls and there will be enough of the latter on any heart river.

2) Not drawing to the nut flush -- better flush draws out there

3) Could be drawing dead already -- paired board hurts us.

I think the nut flush draw will still be too strong to fold in this spot given the price, because number 2 flips in our favour from disfavour.

Let's say the actual turn was a . You can always lead out on this card as a bluff and get villains to fold river pretty often when you brick out, assuming only one calls turn
 
Old
Default
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 07:24 AM
(#3)
fp_boss77's Avatar
Since: Jan 2012
Posts: 490
Thansk Garteh,

But what about check raising the flop ?
It may fold out hands that have quite equity against my like 7x or some weak overpair.
 
Old
Default
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 08:42 AM
(#4)
GarethC23's Avatar
Since: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,273
I dont like the idea of folding or continuing if the aciton gets reopened, I think we're getting such a nice price 3 way that calling is way more profitable
 
Old
Default
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:03 PM
(#5)
tonydolphin's Avatar
Since: Aug 2013
Posts: 75
Would it not have been better to lead out on the flop as a semi bluff. If it gets raised,then fold,if not getting the correct odds.
 
Old
Default
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:40 PM
(#6)
sharpmind93's Avatar
Since: Oct 2013
Posts: 14
Hi Gareth!
But what about a 3-bet preflop to something about $1,30?
I thinck we could represent a huge hand that the othersure will fold...and if they not we have a hand with a huge potential..
 
Old
Default
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 01:11 PM
(#7)
TrustySam's Avatar
Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 8,291
BronzeStar
Quote:
Originally Posted by fp_boss77 View Post
Hi, villain on the BT is playing 21/15/5 FCB=20% over 178 hands. Others are unknown.

If this was heads-up I'd certainly check raise with this hand.

But I'm having trouble proceeding with FD on multi-way pots.
I tend to play more passive.

Hey, fp_boss!


Finally thought of something that might be helpful (?) ... that I got from live training


I guess reads make everything so much easier, because different moves from different villains can mean .... very different things ...


And here we have some - neither of the 'unknowns' is using auto top-up, so we can assume they're likely casual players. And the button, having played almost 200 hands, who's using auto top-up is likely a reg - although the low 'fold to c-bet' is unusual.

The other tip from live training was to check the number of tables people play too, since the more tables a person plays, the more likely it is they're a reg?


Not sure if everyone else who plays 10nl would agree with my ranging here, but an open from utg with 78s isn't something I see very often, so I would assume someone who's betting out that big into 3 people would be doing it with 44/55/77, 88, or possibly 99-AA, and that the outs for Q and J making a pair might very well not be good?

And then, I guess we only want to be check-raising if (1) we have a monster combo draw where we know our outs are good, (2) or if we think everyone'll fold? So here, while it might be more likely an unknown could be playing with a wider range, we don't know for sure that even if that's true, the villain will fold a hand like 78o or a better flush draw. And the button we know for sure most likely won't, so ...


I think you played this hand great! No need to mess with perfection


But like yeah, those tips from live training - they seem like kind of a small thing, but I rely on them a lot, and they seem to help a ton. Def they count as reads, so like ... we do have reads in zoom I think

Last edited by TrustySam; Mon Jan 20, 2014 at 01:28 PM..
 
Old
Default
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 01:22 PM
(#8)
TrustySam's Avatar
Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 8,291
BronzeStar
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrustySam View Post
And then, I guess we only want to be check-raising if (1) we have a monster combo draw where we know our outs are good, (2) or if we think everyone'll fold?
Oh, now that I think about it ... this part's from live training too ... bwahaha! Everything I know about poker has come from PSO, so I guess that goes without saying that if I say anything interesting strategy-wise ... it's not mine


Wonder which class this came from - will check my notes later to see if the spot was similar to this one
 
Old
Default
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 02:35 PM
(#9)
mike2198's Avatar
Since: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrustySam View Post
Hey, fp_boss!


Finally thought of something that might be helpful (?) ... that I got from live training


I guess reads make everything so much easier, because different moves from different villains can mean .... very different things ...


And here we have some - neither of the 'unknowns' is using auto top-up, so we can assume they're likely casual players. And the button, having played almost 200 hands, who's using auto top-up is likely a reg - although the low 'fold to c-bet' is unusual.

The other tip from live training was to check the number of tables people play too, since the more tables a person plays, the more likely it is they're a reg?


Not sure if everyone else who plays 10nl would agree with my ranging here, but an open from utg with 78s isn't something I see very often, so I would assume someone who's betting out that big into 3 people would be doing it with 44/55/77, 88, or possibly 99-AA, and that the outs for Q and J making a pair might very well not be good?

And then, I guess we only want to be check-raising if (1) we have a monster combo draw where we know our outs are good, (2) or if we think everyone'll fold? So here, while it might be more likely an unknown could be playing with a wider range, we don't know for sure that even if that's true, the villain will fold a hand like 78o or a better flush draw. And the button we know for sure most likely won't, so ...


I think you played this hand great! No need to mess with perfection


But like yeah, those tips from live training - they seem like kind of a small thing, but I rely on them a lot, and they seem to help a ton. Def they count as reads, so like ... we do have reads in zoom I think

+1.
 
Old
Default
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 08:05 PM
(#10)
fp_boss77's Avatar
Since: Jan 2012
Posts: 490
Thank you guys for the insights.

Sometimes we play so many hands that we get in a maze when trying to analyze our session later. I think I played it just fine.
 
Old
Default
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 09:52 AM
(#11)
GarethC23's Avatar
Since: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonydolphin View Post
Would it not have been better to lead out on the flop as a semi bluff. If it gets raised,then fold,if not getting the correct odds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharpmind93 View Post
Hi Gareth!
But what about a 3-bet preflop to something about $1,30?
I thinck we could represent a huge hand that the othersure will fold...and if they not we have a hand with a huge potential..
Both these questions sort of ignore all the other hands we get dealt in this situation.

In terms of leading out on the flop as a semi-bluff, I think our hand is simply too good. If we are going to do this I would rather it be with a hand we don't mind folding if we are raised. We mind folding QJhh. overcards with a gutshot and abackdoor flush draw, not so much.

sharpmind, if its true that we could represent a huge hand... why don't we squeeze with A5o or A7s or K9s? I think, again, QJs is just too good at seeing flops, to squeeze. Its a hand that plays well multiway. If we have a great squeeze spot, that doesn't mean we should squeeze every hand. Just like if we have a great bluff spot, we might not want to bet every hand, like the nuts for example.

Certain hands are good for certain things. QJs is a good hand to see a flop with as deep as possible.
 

Getting PokerStars is easy: download and install the PokerStars game software, create your free player account, and validate your email address. Clicking on the download poker button will lead to the installation of compatible poker software on your PC of 51.7 MB, which will enable you to register and play poker on the PokerStars platform. To uninstall PokerStars use the Windows uninstaller: click Start > Control Panel and then select Add or Remove programs > Select PokerStars and click Uninstall or Remove.

Copyright (c) PokerSchoolOnline.com. All rights reserved, Rational Group, Douglas Bay Complex, King Edward Road, Onchan, Isle of Man, IM3 1DZ. You can email us on support@pokerschoolonline.com