Home / Community / Forum / Support Area / Poker News /

Cumulative % IS important

Old
Default
Cumulative % IS important - Fri Oct 11, 2002, 10:00 AM
(#1)
Deleted user
For the majority of players I've checked, cumulative % ups and downs have a direct correlation to PPT. In this informal research, it appears to me that fluctuations in cumulative % are directly related to profitibility of one's play. As cumulative % goes up, so do profits. As it goes down, profits go down.

Of course this seems obvious - but some have argued that cumulative % is meaningless, or that it has little to do with "money". A few examples:

rggator multi trend

minpin multi trend

apryllshowers multi trend

thehazyone multi trend

And a satellite example:

dreams32097 sat trend

Of course there are exceptions. Remember, there are lies, damn lies, and statistics .
 
Old
Default
Fri Oct 11, 2002, 12:18 PM
(#2)
Deleted user
there are correct ways to measure things, there are not quite so correct ways to measure things, there are approximate ways to measure things- but in the end the only accurate way is the correct way.
 
Old
Default
Fri Oct 11, 2002, 01:30 PM
(#3)
Deleted user
Quote:
but some have argued that cumulative % is meaningless, or that it has little to do with "money".
I have never argued this. However, I have argued that the cumulative ranking, if one were to play with that in mind, encourages students to develop/learn/practice a style of play that is not optimal for making the big money places in a tournament. Obviously, beginners will not realise this and think they are learning the best way....survival.

I will admit though, that it is better than playing to the other extreme. i.e. loose and reckless. I also think the cumulative rank is a good thing as it encourages semi-realistic play in the games. It just isn't the best possible feedback system with regards one's tournament ablity. Neither is it a rank of which player is better than another as some seem to think, (which is probably a good thing as it will again encourage serious play from those motivated by such a thing).
 
Old
Default
Fri Oct 11, 2002, 02:07 PM
(#4)
TrumpinJoe's Avatar
Since: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,557
The PSO percent, when compared over a fixed number of similarly sized events, is a good barometer for a moderately aggressive style of play. It rewards those with early patience the most. It penalizes those that tend to bust-out early twice as often (and more) as they make it past the midway point.

If a tournament strategy with more early aggressiveness is the optimal play, PSO will not recognize that. If, as geezer states, the opimum B&M tournament strategy is to build a HUGE stack early or bust out and get into lucrative side-action, PSO is a long, long way off in how they measure performance and prepare future poker players. However, with their stated mission of producing Tournament Poker Champions they are probably fairly close to providing a decent metric.

As it other RL situations, it is rarely possible to develop ONE measure that considers everything.
 

Getting PokerStars is easy: download and install the PokerStars game software, create your free player account, and validate your email address. Clicking on the download poker button will lead to the installation of compatible poker software on your PC of 51.7 MB, which will enable you to register and play poker on the PokerStars platform. To uninstall PokerStars use the Windows uninstaller: click Start > Control Panel and then select Add or Remove programs > Select PokerStars and click Uninstall or Remove.

Copyright (c) PokerSchoolOnline.com. All rights reserved, Rational Group, Douglas Bay Complex, King Edward Road, Onchan, Isle of Man, IM3 1DZ. You can email us on support@pokerschoolonline.com